Remember me
Password recovery

People sex dating in anneta kentucky

Over the years the company had routinely accommodated her wish to wear a while working at the front counter and was terminated. The court, holding that the company had a duty to accommodate plaintiff’s religious practice and could not rely on perceived customer preferences to establish that accommodating plaintiff would cause it undue hardship, granted summary judgment against the employer. The general information contained herein is intended for informational purposes only.
Permission to enter this website and to access content provided through it is strictly limited to consenting adults who affirm under oath and subject to penalties of perjury under title 28 U.